TQOTW: HP Contract & Capital Allowances

My client bought a commercial vehicle under an HP agreement but has not made the final payment and so did not acquire ownership of the vehicle. AIA has already been claimed from the outset. How is this dealt with for capital allowances purposes?

The normal assumption is that a vehicle bought under a hire purchase agreement will become the property of the hirer once the final payment is made at the end of the lease period. S67 CAA 2001 allows the capitalisation of the entire expenditure on the vehicle from delivery providing the asset was in business use at the end of the chargeable period.

 However, if a payment is not made and the vehicle is not acquired then it is treated as having been disposed of by s67(4).

 The disposal value is determined by s68 CA 2001. Where, as in this case, the asset has been brought into use, the disposal value is the total of any capital sums received/receivable (if any) by your client plus the amounts yet to be incurred under the contract – in this case this would be the value of the final instalment not paid.

 The principle is to charge sums on which allowances have already been claimed but which have not actually been paid plus charging any additional sums received. An example illustrating such additional sums is contained in HMRC’s Capital Allowances Manual on page CA23330.

Please share this article with your clients

Our team of experts have a wealth of experience and can also provide a written consultancy service at competitive rates.

Back to Community

Tax Adviser
0844 892 2470

Alec has worked at Croner Taxwise since 2014. He has successfully completed his IR35 training and undertakes contract reviews. Alec gained his tax knowledge whilst working in the consultancy department of Croner Taxwise and he is currently working towards the ATT qualification.

My VIP Tax Team question of the week: SDLT on property transfer to a company via an LLP
My VIP Tax Team question of the week: The tax treatment of company owned gilts
My VIP Tax Team question of the week: Chargeable event gains